Comodo vs Cylance

Comodo, founded in 1998 and based in Bloomfield, New Jersey, have built their reputation on a prevention-first approach to cybersecurity. Although the company rebranded as Xcitium in 2022, the Comodo name remains active for their consumer-focused offerings, especially antivirus software and internet security tools. What sets Comodo apart is their "default-deny" model, a proactive method that automatically contains unknown files before they can harm your system. This technology, combined with real-time malware protection, sandboxing, and customizable firewall settings, forms the core of their free and paid solutions. Comodo’s Internet Security suite, available for Windows, adds extra layers such as secure shopping, VPN access, and live expert support. While some users highlight the software’s powerful features and lightweight performance, others note usability and customer support challenges. Despite this, Comodo has earned recognition in third-party lab tests and continues to appeal to users looking for solid baseline protection, especially those on a budget. Whether you’re considering their no-cost antivirus or a full-featured security suite, this review explores the tools, strengths, and limitations of Comodo’s approach to personal cybersecurity.

Cylance was founded in 2012 in Irvine, California, focusing on using artificial intelligence to prevent cybersecurity threats proactively. While their early success was rooted in enterprise solutions, they expanded into the consumer space in 2018 with Cylance Smart Antivirus—a lightweight, AI-based security tool designed to stop threats before they could run. Their antivirus software didn’t rely on traditional signature updates or scheduled scans. Instead, it analyzed behavior in real time and blocked suspicious files. Users could manage multiple devices through a centralized, cloud-based dashboard. They positioned their service as a minimal-intervention alternative for individuals and families seeking quiet, background protection. However, third-party testing was limited. The one major AV-Test evaluation in 2020 gave them strong performance marks but below-average protection results. They also lacked standard features found in broader security suites, such as VPNs or password managers. BlackBerry acquired Cylance Smart Antivirus in 2019 and gradually phased out their home antivirus. Arctic Wolf's acquisition of the company's enterprise solution led to their complete discontinuation by 2024. What did they bring to the table—and what can today’s users learn from their short-lived approach to home cybersecurity?