Avira Phantom VPN vs Surfshark
공급업체를 편집, 추가 또는 제거하려면 [비교에 추가]를 누르십시오.
Avira Phantom VPN is a trusted name in digital security, offered by Avira, a German company founded in 1986 and headquartered in Tettnang, Germany. As part of Avira’s extensive cybersecurity suite, Phantom VPN is designed to protect users’ online privacy and provide unrestricted internet access. The service features military-grade AES-256 encryption, a strict no-logs policy, and DNS leak protection, ensuring your data and browsing activities remain secure. Compatible with Windows, macOS, Android, and iOS, Avira Phantom VPN offers cross-platform functionality, making it an accessible choice for users on multiple devices. Its ability to bypass geo-restrictions and maintain reliable connections for streaming and browsing sets it apart in a competitive market. While customer reviews highlight its user-friendly interface and privacy features, some users have noted areas for improvement, such as connection speeds and server options. Avira’s integration of the VPN into its Prime Suite adds to its appeal, offering a comprehensive digital security package. With its long-standing reputation in cybersecurity, Avira Phantom VPN provides a dependable and feature-rich option for anyone seeking to enhance their online privacy and freedom. Explore its offerings to discover how it meets your specific needs.
Surfshark, founded in 2018 and headquartered in the Netherlands, is a leading force in online privacy and cybersecurity. Offering a cutting-edge VPN with over 3,200 servers in 100+ countries, they provide fast, reliable access to geo-restricted content while keeping your data fully secure. Their standout features include camouflage mode, which hides VPN usage from ISPs, and multihop, which routes traffic through multiple servers for added security. With a strict no-logs policy and AES-256 encryption, Surfshark ensures user privacy and data protection. They also offer unlimited simultaneous connections, making them a great choice for users with multiple devices. Customers frequently praise Surfshark for their responsive customer support and seamless streaming performance, though some have noted occasional connection issues. Despite this, independent security audits and top industry awards like "VPN Solution of the Year" solidify Surfshark's reputation. Curious to know more? Read our in-depth review to explore all of Surfshark’s innovative features and discover why they are a top contender for anyone looking to take control of their online privacy and security.
- 최고의 가격/월 : $5.99
- 무료 평가판 : 사용 가능
- 보안 및 개인정보 보호 : 우수함
- 지역 검열을 우회 : Good
- 3,000개 넘는 서버 : 1400
- 최고의 가격/월 : $2.49
- 무료 평가판 : 사용 가능
- 보안 및 개인정보 보호 : 우수함
- 지역 검열을 우회 : Good
- 3,000개 넘는 서버 : 3,200+
- 50개 넘는 다양한 서버 위치
- Onion over VPN 서버
- OpenVPN 지원
- WireGuard 지원
- 관리 제어
- 모바일 엡
- 무료 버전
- 무료 플랜
- 자동 양식 채우기 기능
- 토렌트
- 통합 SSOs
- 50개 넘는 다양한 서버 위치
- Onion over VPN 서버
- OpenVPN 지원
- WireGuard 지원
- 관리 제어
- 모바일 엡
- 무료 버전
- 무료 플랜
- 자동 양식 채우기 기능
- 토렌트
- 통합 SSOs
- 256-bit AES 암호화
- 2단계 인증
- RAM에서 실행되는 서버 (하드 드라이브에 데이터가 기록되지 않음)
- Warrant Canary
- 무로그 정책
- 분할 터널링
- 전용 IP 서버
- 킬스위치
- 256-bit AES 암호화
- 2단계 인증
- RAM에서 실행되는 서버 (하드 드라이브에 데이터가 기록되지 않음)
- Warrant Canary
- 무로그 정책
- 분할 터널링
- 전용 IP 서버
- 킬스위치
- 256-bit 암호화 볼트
- 5/9/14 아이즈 동맹 외부에 위치한 국가
- 다크웹 스캔
- 모바일 앱 PIN 잠금 해제
- 보안 암호 공유
- 생체 인식 로그인(페이스 ID, 터치 ID)
- 실행 가능한 암호 보안 수준 보고서
- 256-bit 암호화 볼트
- 5/9/14 아이즈 동맹 외부에 위치한 국가
- 다크웹 스캔
- 모바일 앱 PIN 잠금 해제
- 보안 암호 공유
- 생체 인식 로그인(페이스 ID, 터치 ID)
- 실행 가능한 암호 보안 수준 보고서
- Fire OS
- iOS
- Streaming Devices
- 구글 크롬
- 라우터 지원
- 리눅스
- 맥OS
- 안드로이드
- 윈도우즈
- 호환 가능한 스트리밍 서비스—Undisclosed
- Fire OS
- iOS
- Streaming Devices
- 구글 크롬
- 라우터 지원
- 리눅스
- 맥OS
- 안드로이드
- 윈도우즈
- 호환 가능한 스트리밍 서비스—Undisclosed
- 검색 가능한 도움말 문서 및 가이드
- 라이브 채팅
- 브라우저 확장
- 속도—Undisclosed
- 이메일 지원
- 이메일 티켓 시스템
- 전화 지원
- 검색 가능한 도움말 문서 및 가이드
- 라이브 채팅
- 브라우저 확장
- 속도—Undisclosed
- 이메일 지원
- 이메일 티켓 시스템
- 전화 지원
Avira Phantom VPN vs. Surfshark
When selecting a Virtual Private Network (VPN), it’s essential to compare providers to find the best fit for your needs. This article examines Avira Phantom VPN and Surfshark, focusing on their service range and customization options, ease of use and integration, security and compliance, and pricing.
Service range and customization options
Both Avira Phantom VPN and Surfshark provide essential VPN services, such as encrypted internet connections, IP masking, and access to geo-restricted content. They support major platforms, including Windows, macOS, Android, and iOS, ensuring multi-device compatibility. In terms of security, both VPNs use AES-256 encryption, a gold standard in the industry, and offer automatic connection features that engage the VPN when an unsecured network is detected.
Despite these similarities, Surfshark offers a more extensive server network, with 3,200+ servers in 100 countries, compared to Avira Phantom VPN’s 1,400 servers in 37 countries. This means Surfshark users have access to a broader range of global content and potentially faster connection speeds. Additionally, Surfshark provides advanced features like Camouflage Mode, which hides VPN usage from ISPs, and MultiHop, which routes traffic through multiple servers for extra anonymity. Avira Phantom VPN lacks these specialized features, making it less flexible for users seeking deeper customization options.
Ease of use and integration
Both Avira Phantom VPN and Surfshark prioritize user-friendly interfaces, making it easy for even non-technical users to install and operate their apps. They feature intuitive dashboards for seamless server selection and connection management. Both also include a kill switch, which disconnects users from the internet if the VPN connection drops, preventing data leaks.
However, Surfshark allows unlimited simultaneous device connections, making it an excellent choice for large households or businesses that need to secure multiple devices. In contrast, Avira Phantom VPN limits users to five devices per subscription. Additionally, Surfshark provides dedicated browser extensions for Chrome and Firefox, which Avira Phantom VPN lacks. Surfshark’s frequent updates and integration with Smart DNS for streaming devices also give it an edge in usability.
Security and compliance
Security is a top priority for both VPNs. Both use AES-256 encryption, no-log policies, and kill switches to ensure data protection. They also offer DNS leak protection, helping users keep their online activities private.
Despite these strong commonalities, Surfshark provides more advanced security features, such as Camouflage Mode (which hides VPN usage even from ISPs) and MultiHop (which routes traffic through multiple servers for added privacy). A key consideration for privacy-conscious users is jurisdiction—both VPNs are based in 14 Eyes alliance countries (Surfshark in the Netherlands and Avira Phantom VPN in Germany). This means that, in theory, these governments could be compelled to share data with intelligence agencies from other allied nations.
Pricing
Pricing plays a crucial role when selecting a VPN service. Surfshark offers affordable plans starting at $2.19 per month (when choosing a long-term plan) and includes a 30-day money-back guarantee, making it a cost-effective choice with unlimited device connections.
In contrast, Avira Phantom VPN is more expensive, starting at $5.99 per month for a mobile-only plan, with the full-featured plan costing $10.00 per month (or $6.50 per month when billed annually). Avira offers a free version with a 500 MB monthly data limit (which extends to 1 GB upon registration), but this is far too limited for most users. One advantage Avira does have is its 60-day money-back guarantee, which is longer than Surfshark’s 30-day period.
Conclusion
Both Avira Phantom VPN and Surfshark offer strong security features and reliable VPN services, but Surfshark stands out due to its larger server network, advanced security features, unlimited device connections, and lower pricing. Avira Phantom VPN may appeal to users who already use Avira’s other security products or prefer a simple VPN with basic features.