trusted formPureVPN vs Surfshark | Several.com
우리는 파트너로부터 커미션을 받지만 평가는 공정합니다. 우리에 대한 자세한 내용 '우리가 일하는 방식' 페이지

PureVPN vs Surfshark

공급업체를 편집, 추가 또는 제거하려면 [비교에 추가]를 누르십시오.

찬성
    찬성
      단점
        단점
          several_comparisons-quickOverviewTitle

          PureVPN, established in 2007 and based in Hong Kong, is a prominent provider of online privacy and security services. The company offers a comprehensive VPN service designed to ensure high-speed, secure connections for a variety of online activities, including streaming, gaming, and general browsing. PureVPN’s standout features include over 6,000 servers across 65+ countries, a no-logs policy, and support for modern encryption protocols like WireGuard and OpenVPN. The service also provides specialized features like dedicated servers for streaming platforms and obfuscated servers for bypassing restrictions. Users benefit from 24/7 customer support, and the company has earned recognition for their commitment to privacy, backed by independent audits. With flexible pricing plans and a strong focus on security, PureVPN aims to deliver a reliable and effective VPN solution for individuals and businesses alike.

          several_comparisons-quickOverviewTitle

          Surfshark, founded in 2018 and headquartered in the Netherlands, is a leading force in online privacy and cybersecurity. Offering a cutting-edge VPN with over 3,200 servers in 100+ countries, they provide fast, reliable access to geo-restricted content while keeping your data fully secure. Their standout features include camouflage mode, which hides VPN usage from ISPs, and multihop, which routes traffic through multiple servers for added security. With a strict no-logs policy and AES-256 encryption, Surfshark ensures user privacy and data protection. They also offer unlimited simultaneous connections, making them a great choice for users with multiple devices. Customers frequently praise Surfshark for their responsive customer support and seamless streaming performance, though some have noted occasional connection issues. Despite this, independent security audits and top industry awards like "VPN Solution of the Year" solidify Surfshark's reputation. Curious to know more? Read our in-depth review to explore all of Surfshark’s innovative features and discover why they are a top contender for anyone looking to take control of their online privacy and security.

          several_comparisons-quickStatsTitle
          • 최고의 가격/월 : $3.33
          • 무료 평가판 : 사용 가능
          • 보안 및 개인정보 보호 : 우수함
          • 지역 검열을 우회 : Excellent
          • 3,000개 넘는 서버 : 6,000+
          several_comparisons-quickStatsTitle
          • 최고의 가격/월 : $2.49
          • 무료 평가판 : 사용 가능
          • 보안 및 개인정보 보호 : 우수함
          • 지역 검열을 우회 : Good
          • 3,000개 넘는 서버 : 3,200+
          General Features & Perks
          • 50개 넘는 다양한 서버 위치
          • Onion over VPN 서버
          • OpenVPN 지원
          • WireGuard 지원
          • 관리 제어
          • 모바일 엡
          • 무료 버전
          • 무료 플랜
          • 자동 양식 채우기 기능
          • 토렌트
          • 통합 SSOs
          General Features & Perks
          • 50개 넘는 다양한 서버 위치
          • Onion over VPN 서버
          • OpenVPN 지원
          • WireGuard 지원
          • 관리 제어
          • 모바일 엡
          • 무료 버전
          • 무료 플랜
          • 자동 양식 채우기 기능
          • 토렌트
          • 통합 SSOs
          Security Measures
          • 256-bit AES 암호화
          • 2단계 인증
          • RAM에서 실행되는 서버 (하드 드라이브에 데이터가 기록되지 않음)
          • Warrant Canary
          • 무로그 정책
          • 분할 터널링
          • 전용 IP 서버
          • 킬스위치
          Security Measures
          • 256-bit AES 암호화
          • 2단계 인증
          • RAM에서 실행되는 서버 (하드 드라이브에 데이터가 기록되지 않음)
          • Warrant Canary
          • 무로그 정책
          • 분할 터널링
          • 전용 IP 서버
          • 킬스위치
          Privacy Features
          • 256-bit 암호화 볼트
          • 5/9/14 아이즈 동맹 외부에 위치한 국가
          • 다크웹 스캔
          • Undisclosed
            모바일 앱 PIN 잠금 해제
          • 보안 암호 공유
          • 생체 인식 로그인(페이스 ID, 터치 ID)
          • 실행 가능한 암호 보안 수준 보고서
          Privacy Features
          • 256-bit 암호화 볼트
          • 5/9/14 아이즈 동맹 외부에 위치한 국가
          • 다크웹 스캔
          • 모바일 앱 PIN 잠금 해제
          • 보안 암호 공유
          • 생체 인식 로그인(페이스 ID, 터치 ID)
          • 실행 가능한 암호 보안 수준 보고서
          Device Compatibility
          • Fire OS
          • iOS
          • Streaming Devices
          • 구글 크롬
          • 라우터 지원
          • 리눅스
          • 맥OS
          • 안드로이드
          • 윈도우즈
          • Undisclosed
            호환 가능한 스트리밍 서비스
          Device Compatibility
          • Fire OS
          • iOS
          • Streaming Devices
          • 구글 크롬
          • 라우터 지원
          • 리눅스
          • 맥OS
          • 안드로이드
          • 윈도우즈
          • Undisclosed
            호환 가능한 스트리밍 서비스
          Customer Service
          • 검색 가능한 도움말 문서 및 가이드
          • 라이브 채팅
          • 브라우저 확장
          • Undisclosed
            속도
          • 이메일 지원
          • Undisclosed
            이메일 티켓 시스템
          • 전화 지원
          Customer Service
          • 검색 가능한 도움말 문서 및 가이드
          • 라이브 채팅
          • 브라우저 확장
          • Undisclosed
            속도
          • 이메일 지원
          • 이메일 티켓 시스템
          • 전화 지원

          PureVPN vs. Surfshark

          PureVPN and Surfshark stand out as prominent choices for users seeking reliable and feature-rich services. The following comparison delves into various aspects of both providers, including service range and customization options, ease of use and integration, security and compliance, and pricing, to assist users in making an informed decision.

          Service range and customization options

          Both PureVPN and Surfshark offer extensive server networks, providing users with a wide array of connection options to enhance their online experience. PureVPN boasts over 6,000 servers across 66 countries, while Surfshark operates more than 3,200 servers in 100 countries. This extensive coverage ensures that users can access content from various regions with ease. Additionally, both providers support multiple VPN protocols, including WireGuard, OpenVPN, and IKEv2, allowing users to select the protocol that best suits their needs. Features such as split tunneling are also available on both platforms, enabling users to route specific traffic through the VPN while allowing other traffic to access the internet directly.
          Despite these similarities, there are notable differences in their service offerings. Surfshark distinguishes itself by providing unlimited simultaneous device connections under a single subscription, making it an ideal choice for users with multiple devices or households with numerous users. In contrast, PureVPN limits users to 10 simultaneous connections. Furthermore, Surfshark offers unique features such as CleanWeb, which blocks ads, trackers, and malware, and MultiHop, allowing users to route their traffic through multiple servers for enhanced security. 

          Ease of use and integration

          User experience is a critical factor when choosing a VPN, and both PureVPN and Surfshark have developed intuitive applications compatible with a wide range of devices and operating systems, including Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS. They also offer browser extensions for popular browsers like Chrome and Firefox, enhancing accessibility for users. The installation processes for both VPNs are straightforward, catering to both novice and experienced users.

          However, Surfshark’s user interface is often praised for its simplicity and modern design, which may appeal more to users seeking a seamless experience. The platform’s features are easily accessible, and the settings are user-friendly, allowing for quick customization. On the other hand, PureVPN provides a more detailed interface with a plethora of settings and options, which might be advantageous for users who prefer a higher degree of control over their VPN configurations. This complexity, however, could be overwhelming for those who prioritize simplicity.

          Security and compliance

          Security is paramount in VPN services, and both providers implement robust measures to protect user data. They utilize AES-256 encryption, a standard considered highly secure. Additionally, both offer a kill switch feature, which disconnects the internet connection if the VPN connection drops, preventing data leaks. They also maintain strict no-logs policies, ensuring that user activities are not recorded. These no-logs policies have been independently audited, adding a layer of credibility to their privacy commitments.

          A key differentiator is Surfshark’s use of RAM-only servers, which means that data is not stored on hard drives and is wiped with every server reboot. PureVPN does not currently employ this technology. Furthermore, Surfshark offers additional security features such as MultiHop and CleanWeb, which provide extra layers of protection against tracking and malware. PureVPN, while offering features like split tunneling and dedicated IP addresses, does not include an ad and malware blocker in its standard offerings.

          Pricing

          Cost is a significant consideration for many users when selecting a VPN service. Surfshark is generally more affordable, especially for long-term commitments. Surfshark’s two-year plan is priced at approximately $2.19 per month, offering substantial value given its unlimited device connections and comprehensive feature set. PureVPN’s pricing is slightly higher, with its two-year plan averaging around $4.07 per month. While PureVPN offers a 31-day money-back guarantee, Surfshark provides a 30-day money-back guarantee, allowing users to try the services risk-free.

          Conclusion

          In conclusion, both PureVPN and Surfshark offer robust VPN services with extensive server networks, strong security measures, and user-friendly applications. However, Surfshark’s advantages in offering unlimited device connections, additional security features, and more competitive pricing make it a compelling choice for users seeking a comprehensive and cost-effective VPN solution. Conversely, PureVPN’s extensive server count and advanced configuration options may appeal to users who require specific functionalities and are willing to invest slightly more for these capabilities.